Dress for Success!

I went to a job fair today.​

While the fair itself was only mildly successful (half of the employers there were only interested in talking with people who already have a security clearance, and most of the remainder were not hiring anything remotely resembling mechanical engineers),  I learned the most while standing in line, waiting to get in. ​

I found myself speaking with a woman who had recently learned about how to dress for an interview from a specialized "how to dress for an interview" consultant.  I did not catch his name, but if you wish to hire him for his advice, it's $300 up front plus $100 per hour.  I believe the woman heard him speak at a get-a-job seminar; she did not hire him herself.​  The following is a summary, in my own voice, of what she relayed to me about his advice, to the best of my memory, with some commentary of my own.

Now, for a job fair, it's not too terribly important to be nitpicky about your attire.  Wear something businesslike, yes, but don't get uptight about it.  However, interviews are a very different thing.  Upon walking in the Room of Interviewing, you will be judged "within 8 seconds" on your appearance.  Your interviewer already has decided what they think about you in those first critical 8 seconds.  How?  Body language and facial expression certainly.  But what is really key is how you dress.​

Men, you need to wear a suit.  No sport jackets.  No light suits, for that indicates you're on your way to South Beach to have a tequila, and no black suits, for that indicates you're on your way to a funeral (or possibly preemptively mourning your unsuccessful interview).  Wear a gray suit.  That says you mean business.​  It also says you are "here to play."

Wear a power tie.  You need a tie that says "I am here to win."  Bold colors can be good - lime green or lavender even.  But don't get too crazy with it.  And don't wear something muted.  Heaven forbid the interview finish and your interviewer forget you exist because your tie was boring.​  It is also good to have a handkerchief in your suit pocket.  Doesn't matter if it's a slightly different purple than your lavender tie.  You just need the interviewer to think, as he looks over his notes and chooses whom to employ, "oh yeah, I remember the guy with the handkerchief in his pocket.  That's who I'm going to hire.  What a fine handkerchief."

Wallets.  Do not have a fat wallet.  Remove all the business cards and high school photo IDs you still keep for some reason.  Slim wallets are key.  And they must be in your front pants pocket.  Not the back pocket and not your shirt pocket.​

Have excellent shoes.  The woman with whom I spoke pointed to a man in line and said, "The consultant recommends those type of dress shoes."  I regret to inform you that I do not remember what they look like.  So hopefully you do not choose the wrong type of shoe for your interview.  I can assure you that they were neither sandals nor Vibram Five-Fingers.​

As for women (the consultant, being a man, had less to say for women, it seems), you should wear a skirt ("appropriate length, of course"), to let the interviewers know you are comfortable with your femininity.  However, you should bring a briefcase to your interview.  Not a purse.​  Your shoes can have an open toe or open heel, but not both, as this is tacky.  If you have long hair, tie it back.  Wear simple earrings and a simple necklace to accentuate your neckline.

So ends my recollection of our conversation.  You will note a hint of exasperation in my retelling.  Clearly, one must dress well for an interview.  It is an important part of the hiring process, and one must demonstrate their seriousness and commitment.  Yet as I thought about this consultant's advice as I returned home from the fair, I found it to be rather frustrating.  Is my competency for a job to be determined by the size and location of my wallet?  Will I be remembered more for my tie than my problem-solving, communication, and multi-disciplinary abilities?  ​

Granted, one must remember the context, or lack thereof.  We spoke only of this consultant's general advice.  Our discussion did not move to other aspects of a job interview, what industry in particular (if any) with which this consultant was ​associated, and where one's attire really does rate on the scale of interview importance (I assume the existence of such metrics).

Do what you will with the information above.  My advice?  Dress well for your interview.  But what truly matters is who you are, what you bring to the table​, and how your gifts and talents can fit into the broader vision of whoever is thinking about hiring you.

An interviewer who gets hung up on the size of your earrings (exceptions made for literal cases), or allows the color of your tie to majorly influence a hiring decision, is focused on the wrong things.

You are intrinsically valuable.  Be remembered for that.​

The First Twenty Five Miles

In my wanderings through Patapsco State Park over the years, I've noticed mile markers along the B&O Railroad.  Took a few photos of them, several years ago, without much thought.

Then came the idea to photograph all the mile markers from the beginning of the line out to the Henryton train tunnel near Marriottsville road.

Off I've gone to various parts of the state park, walking along various trails to reach these markers - making sure no two images are too similar to one another, while still trying to keep the tracks visible in each photograph.  Something interesting usually happens along the way - I meet some deer or a hiking family; scare a fox or talk with a biker.

Aspiring railroad nerds (I don't think I classify, but perhaps I do...) can learn some history of the railroad here.

Here's a slideshow of the photos I've taken so far.

2013 Seniors: Meg

I had the pleasure of taking Meg's senior portraits this past week.  We had a fairly overcast sky and a cooler-than-usual morning, resulting in some slightly muted tones in the final images.

Meg was the first of my clients to chose to go to Font Hill Wetlands Park.  A great choice, and I think we got some great images there! She, along with many others, also chose the popular Howard County Conservancy as a second location.  I enjoy both locations for the variety of scenes and backdrops available.

Meg has a busy year ahead of her and is thinking of applying to several great colleges.  I wish her the best!

 

The Epic Quest for an Entry-Level Job: Part II

A month after my first post on the subject, not much is obviously different.  I have received no communication regarding anything for which I have applied, save a few surreptitious "no longer under consideration" notices that have appeared  after logging back into a couple company career websites.

I have begun to ask friends and acquaintances about possible openings at various companies, which may soon open some doors.  So far, however, responses have generally been negative.

My resume has received my scrutinous gaze, with various tweaks along the way.  The engineer in me wants feedback, but must settle himself with the fact that this is not going to be like the simple SISO controllers we learned about in System Dynamics.

This and the previous post may seem pessimistic, and I do hope my language is clinical and not emotionally-charged.  Indeed, I am not pessimistic.  Occasionally frustrated, certainly, but I trust in a loving God who will provide.  Perhaps I do not have a job because there is something I must learn, or some way I must serve, here in the meantime.  I am thankful for the resources and income that I do have at the moment, and I trust that this process will result in gainful employment at some point.

What I have noticed and discussed at length with my friend Steven, who is in roughly the same predicament in which I find myself, are the inherent contradictions in job searching.

There seems to be an expectation of creativity among new hires.  This new talent sees the world differently, and "thinks outside the box" and other clichés.  However, I am also finding these job descriptions to be rather narrow.  Specificity is also highly valued.  Yet how can the two extremes meaningfully coexist?  Someone who spends all their education and free time learning about a certain type of laser will not necessarily have the creativity to bring massive change to his or her focus, if we define creativity as the ability to synthesize wildly different notions and bring about something new.  We speak of a well-rounded student drawing from various types of knowledge to fuel creativity, and in the same breath seem to expect students to spend many years working towards a Masters or PhD in a very narrow field.  There must be a middle ground.  But sometimes it seems as though the goal is to find an employee who embodies both extremes.

Another contradiction, perhaps: Searching for creative people by putting resumes through a keyword algorithm before an HR person even views said resumes.  Creativity, the ability to learn and adapt, and relational aptitudes - all very necessary - are incredibly difficult to quantify.  But the question must be asked: how does one deal with the flood of resumes pouring in for each new open position in an efficient manner without resorting to methods that cannot easily (if at all) measure such necessary abilities?  For that, I have no good answer.

So I continue to work and talk with people and consider how I might better go about finding a job - because through my mind stubbornly rings the idea that there is always a better way.